CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Miscellaneous Provisions (GST)
Ravi Traders, a registered person in Pune, sold goods on approval to Mehta Stores on 10 January, which was two months before the appointed day. Mehta Stores rejected the goods and returned them to Ravi Traders four months after the appointed day. The goods are taxable under the GST Act. What is the GST position under the transitional provisions?
No tax is payable. Goods sent on approval not earlier than six months before the appointed day, and rejected and returned within six months from the appointed day, attract no GST. Both time limits are satisfied here, so neither party owes tax.
- ANo tax is payable, because the goods were sent on approval within six months before the appointed day and came back within six months from the appointed dayCorrect
- BTax is payable by Mehta Stores, because the goods were returned after the appointed day
- CTax is payable by Ravi Traders, because the goods were not returned before the appointed day
- DTax is payable by Mehta Stores unless the Commissioner grants an extension of two months
Explanation
Goods sent on approval not earlier than six months before the appointed day and returned within six months from the appointed day attract no tax. Here the dispatch was two months before and the return was four months after, so both conditions are met. Option B wrongly treats any post-appointed-day return as taxable.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Miscellaneous Provisions (GST) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Miscellaneous Provisions (GST) questions
- Meera Industries, registered under GST, returned duty-paid goods to Kapoor Engineering, a registered manufacturer, within six months from th…
- Bharat Auto Components Ltd supplied parts under a contract made before the appointed day. After the appointed day the price was revised down…
- Under a contract entered into before the appointed day, Delta Engineering supplied goods to Mehra Ltd. After the appointed day, on 10 July, …
- Nair Steel received a refund claim order under the existing law: a claim for CENVAT credit refund was filed before the appointed day and was…
- Under a contract signed before the appointed day, Kaveri Engineering Pvt Ltd supplied machine parts to Delta Works Ltd, both registered. Aft…
- Gupta Electricals, a registered person, removed goods in a month five months before the appointed day after paying duty under the existing l…