CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Patent Databases and Patent Information System
Rohan asks the Controller, in the prescribed manner, for information about a pending application. He asks for a matter that the rules do not prescribe as a subject of information, and he has paid the prescribed fee. Based on the wording of Section 153, which statement is most accurate?
The entitlement is limited to prescribed matters. Section 153 grants information only on matters that may be prescribed, for a specified patent or application, on request and payment of the prescribed fee, so a request outside the prescribed matters is not covered.
- AThe entitlement under Section 153 extends to any matter he chooses to ask about
- BThe entitlement is limited to matters that are prescribed, so it does not cover his requestCorrect
- CThe entitlement applies only to granted patents, not applications
- DThe fee payment alone makes the Controller bound to supply any information
Explanation
Section 153 covers information relating to 'such matters as may be prescribed'. Payment of fee does not widen that scope. It applies to both patents and applications, so the limit is the prescribed matters, not grant status.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Patent Databases and Patent Information System shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Patent Databases and Patent Information System questions
- Anand Tech files an Indian patent application and is prosecuting an application for substantially the same invention in Japan. Which stateme…
- On 1 March, the Controller sends a written notice to Veda Pharma Pvt Ltd, a patentee whose patent is in force, asking for information on the…
- Sunrise Agro Ltd furnished working statements to the Controller under section 146. A journalist asks whether the Controller may make this in…
- Meera, a patent agent in Pune, wants to know the status of a pending patent application filed by Kiran Pharma Ltd. She writes to the Control…
- Anand Labs, a patentee, has received no notice from the Controller. It is told by its advisor that it need not file any working statement un…
- Lakshmi Pharma Ltd, a patentee, receives no notice from the Controller. A rule prescribes the form and intervals for statements on working o…