CMA Final · Corporate and Economic Laws · Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement
Rohan Textiles Ltd's managing director Mr Iyer resigned voluntarily, not in connection with any reconstruction or amalgamation, and then claimed compensation for loss of office. What is the position under the Act?
No compensation may be paid. Section 202(2)(b) prohibits payment where a managing director resigns from office otherwise than as a result of reconstruction or amalgamation. The three-year cap applies only to payments that are otherwise permitted, so it does not rescue this claim.
- AHe may be paid, capped at three years' average remuneration
- BHe may be paid if the Board approves by simple majority
- CHe may be paid only if he waits twelve months
- DNo payment may be made, as he resigned otherwise than on reconstruction or amalgamationCorrect
Explanation
Section 202(2)(b) bars payment where the director resigns otherwise than on reconstruction or amalgamation. The cap in section 202(3) applies only to permitted payments, so option A is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement questions
- A person against whom the Central Government has referred a case to the Tribunal under section 241(3) is treated as follows under the Act:
- Under the provisions on relief in cases of oppression, which of the following may itself apply to the Tribunal for an order if it is of the …
- Shyam Ltd's whole-time director Mr. Iyer ceases to hold office. He earned an average remuneration of ₹30 lakh per year over the preceding th…
- Under Section 202 of the Companies Act, 2013, Mr. Rao, a managing director of Kaveri Ltd, is removed from office. Which statement about comp…
- Under section 241(3), when the Central Government sees circumstances such as fraud, misfeasance or persistent negligence by a person concern…
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, which of the following is a ground on which a member may apply to the Tribunal for relief under Section 241(1…