CA Final · Financial Reporting · Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Sahyadri Infra Ltd issued a financial guarantee contract to a bank for a loan taken by its supplier. The guarantee is not designated at fair value through profit or loss and the transfer-of-asset provisions do not apply. Under Ind AS 109, how should Sahyadri Infra subsequently measure the guarantee after initial recognition?
An issuer measures a financial guarantee contract after initial recognition at the higher of two amounts: the Section 5.5 loss allowance, and the amount initially recognised less, where appropriate, cumulative income recognised under Ind AS 115. This applies unless the contract is at FVTPL or the transfer provisions apply.
- AAt the higher of the loss allowance under Section 5.5 and the amount initially recognised less, where appropriate, cumulative income recognised under Ind AS 115Correct
- BAt the lower of the loss allowance under Section 5.5 and the amount initially recognised less cumulative income recognised
- CAt amortised cost using the effective interest method on the premium received
- DAt fair value through other comprehensive income with recycling on expiry
Explanation
Para 4.2.1(c) requires an issuer of a financial guarantee contract, unless FVTPL or the transfer provisions apply, to measure it at the higher of the loss allowance and the initial amount less cumulative income recognised under Ind AS 115. The 'lower of' option reverses the rule. Amortised cost is the general default and is displaced by this specific exception.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities questions
- Ind AS 109 states the basis on which an entity classifies financial assets as measured at amortised cost, FVOCI or FVTPL, unless para 4.1.5 …
- Mahanadi Steels Ltd adopted Ind AS 109 from the beginning of its current reporting period. Until the previous year it held a portfolio of go…
- Himalaya Foods Ltd holds a debt instrument whose classification is being determined under Ind AS 109 (no fair value option or para 4.1.5 exc…
- Kaveri Infra Ltd. acquired a business and recognised contingent consideration payable to the sellers, linked to future EBITDA targets, under…
- Kaveri Infra Ltd acquired a business and recognised contingent consideration payable to the sellers, initially at Rs 40 lakh, as part of the…
- Kaveri Infra Ltd acquired a business and recognised contingent consideration payable to the sellers, estimated at Rs 2,00,000 at the acquisi…