CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · AS 26 Intangible Assets
Sarvam Pharma Ltd. spent ₹40 lakh on a research phase to find a new drug formulation and then ₹25 lakh on development after all AS 26 criteria for recognition as an intangible asset were demonstrably met. Which amount should be recognised as an intangible asset?
₹25 lakh is recognised as an intangible asset. AS 26 requires all research-phase expenditure to be expensed as incurred, while development expenditure is capitalised once the recognition criteria are demonstrated. The ₹40 lakh research cost is therefore charged to profit and loss.
- A₹65 lakh
- B₹40 lakh
- C₹25 lakhCorrect
- DNil, since both are expenses
Explanation
Under AS 26, research-phase expenditure is always charged to profit and loss. Development expenditure is capitalised only from the point when all criteria are met. So only ₹25 lakh is capitalised. Capitalising ₹65 lakh wrongly includes research cost.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on AS 26 Intangible Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More AS 26 Intangible Assets questions
- Mehta Textiles Ltd bought a trademark by paying Rs 9,00,000 purchase price, Rs 50,000 non-refundable import duty, Rs 30,000 legal fees for r…
- Rao Software Ltd began developing an accounting package. Expenditure: Rs 8 lakh from April to June (before criteria were met), and Rs 6 lakh…
- Veda Textiles Ltd. incurred Rs 8 lakh on a research phase to find a new dye formula and Rs 12 lakh on a subsequent development phase, after …
- Pragati Ltd. incurred the following during the year: ₹8 lakh on an advertising campaign for existing products, ₹6 lakh on staff training, ₹1…
- Ananya Foods Ltd incurred the following during 2025-26: Rs 9 lakh on staff training, Rs 15 lakh on an advertising campaign for a new brand, …
- Ravi Foods Ltd incurred the following in 2025-26: Rs 4,00,000 on staff training, Rs 6,00,000 on a brand-building advertising campaign, Rs 2,…