CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws
SEBI appoints Adv. Meera Joshi, who has practised as an advocate for six years and ten months, to conduct a prosecution before a Special Court under the SEBI Act. She has held no post under the Union or a State. Is she eligible under the Act?
She is not eligible. The prosecutor before a Special Court must have practised as an advocate for at least seven years, or held a post under the Union or a State requiring special knowledge of law for at least seven years. Meera meets neither test.
- AYes, because any advocate enrolled with a Bar Council may conduct such prosecution
- BYes, because the Special Court may waive the experience requirement
- CNo, because the person must have practised as an advocate for at least seven years or held a qualifying post for at least seven yearsCorrect
- DNo, because only a serving Union government officer may conduct the prosecution
Explanation
Section 26D(2) requires the prosecutor to have practised as an advocate for not less than seven years, or to have held for not less than seven years a post under the Union or a State requiring special knowledge of law. Meera has under seven years of practice and no such post, so she is ineligible. Government service is an alternative route, not the only one.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws questions
- Pranav Depository Participants Pvt Ltd is aggrieved by a SAT order passed under the Depositories Act, 1996. It receives communication of the…
- During an appeal by Deshmukh Investments against an adjudicating officer's order under the SCRA, 1956, SAT wishes to have a witness examined…
- A depository's draft bye-laws, adopted without SEBI's approval, are challenged. Later SEBI, finding a bye-law inadequate, orders the deposit…
- Ketan Rao is being prosecuted before a Special Court established under the SEBI Act, 1992 for a securities offence. His counsel argues that …
- A two-member Bench of SAT hears an appeal filed by Anand Textiles Ltd. The two members differ in opinion on a point of law. What is the proc…
- In an appeal filed by Kavita Brokers Pvt. Ltd., the appellant did not appear on the date of hearing and SAT dismissed the appeal for default…