CS Executive · Capital Market and Securities Laws · Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market
Section 15HA of the SEBI Act, 1992 imposes a monetary penalty on a person who does which of the following?
Section 15HA penalises any person who indulges in fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities. The penalty is at least five lakh rupees and may extend to twenty-five crore rupees or three times the profits made, whichever is higher.
- AIndulges in fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securitiesCorrect
- BFails to file an annual return with the Registrar
- CDelays the issue of share certificates by a company
- DRefuses to attend a general meeting as a director
Explanation
Section 15HA applies to any person who indulges in fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities. The other options are matters of company law compliance, not penalised under this section.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market questions
- Meera Securities is alleged to have made a profit of Rs 2 crore through a fraudulent practice in securities. Under Section 15HA of the SEBI …
- Ravi made profits of Rs 12 crore through a fraudulent scheme in the shares of a listed company. Under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act, 1992, wh…
- Under Section 15HA, the upper limit of penalty for fraudulent and unfair trade practices is expressed as twenty-five crore rupees or three t…
- Meera made profits of Rs 2 crore from practices held fraudulent and unfair under the securities laws. Which statement about the maximum pena…
- Section 15HA of the SEBI Act, 1992 applies to a person who indulges in which of the following?
- A broker's client indulged in a fraudulent practice and the profit made was only Rs 1 lakh. A student argues that the penalty under Section …