CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Laws relating to Crime and its Procedure
Section 3(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 provides that every definition of an offence is to be understood subject to the General Exceptions. Why does the definition of an offence not need to repeat that a child under seven years cannot commit it?
The General Exceptions are read into every definition of an offence, every penal provision and every illustration, even though they are not repeated. So a child under seven years is covered by the exception without each definition saying so.
- ABecause the definitions apply only to adults by a separate rule of procedure
- BBecause the exceptions in the Chapter on General Exceptions are read into every definition and penal provision even though not repeatedCorrect
- CBecause a child under seven years is liable only if a court specially directs
- DBecause the exceptions apply only to illustrations and not to the definitions
Explanation
Section 3(1) states that every definition, penal provision and illustration is understood subject to the General Exceptions though not repeated. Illustration (a) uses the child under seven years example. The option about court direction is wrong because the exception is automatic.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Laws relating to Crime and its Procedure shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Laws relating to Crime and its Procedure questions
- Ramesh's complaint of cheating against Sunil is being tried by a Magistrate as a complaint case. During the trial, it appears to the Magistr…
- Under Section 176(3) of the BNSS, 2023, on receipt of information about an offence punishable for seven years or more, what must the officer…
- A attacks Z under grave provocation so that the killing would be only culpable homicide not amounting to murder. B, who bears ill-will towar…
- Ravi, a police officer, arrests Karan without a warrant. Karan has just committed murder. Ravi is charged with wrongful confinement. Under t…
- A, a jailor, intending to cause prisoner Z's death, illegally omits to give Z food, and also beats Z. Z dies from the combined effect. What …
- Kabir knowingly arranges a safe house for his brother-in-law, who is wanted for committing organised crime, so that the latter can evade arr…