CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · Non-Compliances, Penalties and Adjudications
Sharma Crafts Private Limited is a recognised start-up company under the Companies Act, 2013. It filed its annual return late, and the penalty under section 92(5) for the company would otherwise be Rs 1,20,000. Under section 446B, what is the maximum penalty on the company?
The maximum penalty is Rs 60,000. Section 446B allows a start-up company a penalty of not more than one-half of the specified penalty, subject to a cap of Rs 2 lakh for a company. Half of Rs 1,20,000 is Rs 60,000, within the cap.
- ARs 60,000Correct
- BRs 1,20,000
- CRs 2,00,000
- DRs 30,000
Explanation
Section 446B caps the penalty at one-half of the penalty specified, subject to Rs 2 lakh for a company. Half of Rs 1,20,000 is Rs 60,000, which is below the Rs 2 lakh cap. Rs 1,20,000 ignores the concession.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Non-Compliances, Penalties and Adjudications shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Non-Compliances, Penalties and Adjudications questions
- Mr. Rao, an officer of Delta Infra Ltd, is accused of an offence under the Companies Act, 2013 and is forwarded to an Executive Magistrate u…
- Orion Components Ltd failed to file a return with the Registrar. While considering the compounding proposal, the Regional Director directs a…
- Zenith Agro Pvt Ltd is a small company. A section provides a penalty of rupees five lakh on the company and rupees three lakh on each office…
- Kavya Foods Pvt Ltd, an ordinary private company that is not small, a start-up, an OPC or a Producer Company, was penalised by an adjudicati…
- The Central Government has appointed Mr. Rao, a Registrar of Companies, as an adjudicating officer under the Companies Act, 2013. Which stat…
- During a summary trial of an officer of Orbit Foods Ltd, the Special Court realises that the case may warrant imprisonment of more than one …