Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Leader · Strategic choices

Solace Telecom wants to enter a market where regulations restrict foreign ownership, speed matters, and it lacks local licences. Which development method is most appropriate given these constraints?

An alliance or joint venture with a local partner is most appropriate. It gets round foreign ownership limits, provides licences and local knowledge, and allows faster entry than building from scratch. Full acquisition and wholly owned start-up are blocked by the restrictions, and divestment does not achieve entry.

  1. AWholly owned organic start-up
  2. BFull acquisition of a local operator
  3. CAlliance or joint venture with a local partnerCorrect
  4. DDivestment of existing operations

Explanation

Foreign ownership restrictions rule out full acquisition or a wholly owned start-up, and a local partner supplies licences and speed. An alliance or joint venture fits these constraints. Divestment is not a way to enter a market.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Strategic choices shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Strategic choices questions