FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · The Governance of Risk Management
Some firms in the 2007-2009 crisis held concentrated exposures to complex structured products that the board did not fully understand, yet approved the positions on the strength of management's assurance. Which responsibility of the board was most clearly neglected?
The board neglected its responsibility to set risk appetite and to challenge management on whether material risks are understood and consistent with that appetite. Approving complex concentrated positions on management's assurance alone shows a lack of effective challenge, which is a core oversight duty.
- ASetting the firm's risk appetite and challenging management on whether risks are understood and aligned with itCorrect
- BExecuting the daily trading strategy
- CPreparing the firm's financial statements
- DSetting the pricing of retail deposit products
Explanation
The board is responsible for setting risk appetite and for effectively challenging management, including ensuring it understands material risks. Approving positions it did not understand reflects a failure of challenge. Daily trading, accounts preparation and deposit pricing are management tasks.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Governance of Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Governance of Risk Management questions
- A bank's board risk committee reviews a report showing that a business unit repeatedly breached its VaR limit, each time receiving a retrosp…
- A bank's board wants to make its risk appetite statement operational. Which step most directly converts the board-level appetite into day-to…
- A review of a bank that suffered large losses in the 2007-2009 crisis found that senior management had approved a strategy of rapidly growin…
- In the three lines of defense model for risk governance at a bank, which function is the second line of defense?
- A review of a failed institution finds the following: (i) the board contained several members with extensive trading experience but none wit…
- A firm's risk appetite statement sets a maximum 99% one-day VaR of USD 20 million for the trading division as a hard limit, with an internal…