CS Professional · Labour Laws and Practice · The Labour Laws (Simplification of Procedure for Furnishing Returns and Maintaining Registers by Certain Establishments) Act, 1988
Sunrise Textiles Pvt Ltd, a small establishment in Surat, files the annual return in Form I and keeps the registers in Forms II and III at the work spot, but it does not maintain the separate registers that the Factories Act, 1948 prescribes. Under the 1988 Act, what is its position on penalty for not keeping those registers?
The employer is not liable to any penalty under the Scheduled Act. Section 4(5) protects an employer who furnishes the annual return in Form I and maintains the prescribed registers as the proviso requires, so failure to keep the Scheduled Act's own registers carries no penalty.
- AIt is liable to the penalty under the Factories Act because the 1988 Act does not override Scheduled Acts
- BIt is not liable to any penalty under the Scheduled Act for failing to furnish those returns or maintain those registers, since it complied with the provisoCorrect
- CIt is liable only if the Inspector first issues a written notice
- DIt is liable to half the penalty under the Scheduled Act
Explanation
Section 4(5) says that where the employer furnishes returns or maintains registers as provided in the proviso to section 4(1), the Scheduled Act does not make him liable to any penalty for failing to furnish any return or maintain any register under that Act. Sunrise complied with the proviso, so no penalty arises. The option claiming liability ignores this protection.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Labour Laws (Simplification of Procedure for Furnishing Returns and Maintaining Registers by Certain Establishments) Act, 1988 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Labour Laws (Simplification of Procedure for Furnishing Returns and Maintaining Registers by Certain Establishments) Act, 1988 questions
- Mehta Tea Estates, a very small establishment, keeps a Form III register and files the annual return in Form I. It believes the 1988 Act rel…
- Sunrise Textiles in Surat has a factory in which, on its busiest day in the preceding twelve months, 8 persons were employed. The Factories …
- For a Scheduled Act that does not define 'employer', what does 'employer' mean under this Act?
- Himalaya Tea Estates, a plantation employing 25 persons, has adopted Form I, II and III under the Act. The manager believes this also frees …
- Under the Act, the term 'Scheduled Act' is defined as an Act specified in the First Schedule. Which additional feature is stated in the defi…
- Meera runs a tea estate in Assam and wants to know whether it can be an 'establishment' for the purposes of the Act, which uses a Scheduled …