Skip to content

CA Foundation · Business Laws · The Indian Contract Act, 1872

Suresh contracted with Tanvi to paint her house for Rs 60,000. After completing about half the work, Tanvi stopped him without any reason and refused to let him continue. Which remedy is most directly available to Suresh for the work already done?

Suresh can sue on quantum meruit, claiming a reasonable amount for the work already done. Because Tanvi wrongfully prevented completion, he is entitled to remuneration for his part performance. Specific performance of a painting job is not ordinarily granted, and the unfinished contract does not bar his claim.

  1. ASuit upon quantum meruit for a reasonable sum for the work doneCorrect
  2. BSpecific performance of the painting contract
  3. CClaim of liquidated damages only if written in the contract
  4. DNo remedy, as the contract was not completed

Explanation

When one party prevents the other from completing a contract, the injured party may claim reasonable remuneration for work already done, called quantum meruit. Specific performance of personal service-type work is not ordinarily granted. Lack of completion is not a bar because Tanvi caused it.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on The Indian Contract Act, 1872 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise The Indian Contract Act, 1872Free diagnostic mock

More The Indian Contract Act, 1872 questions