Skip to content

CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Board's Accountability on ESG

Tara Infra Ltd's board has strong diversity of gender and age but all directors have served together for over a decade and share similar professional backgrounds. An investor argues this is weak diversity for ESG oversight. Which reasoning best supports the investor's view?

The investor is right because diversity of thought, background and experience reduces groupthink and strengthens challenge on ESG risks. Demographic variety alone, such as gender and age, does not ensure that a board with similar backgrounds and long shared tenure will question sustainability issues effectively.

  1. ADiversity means only the number of women directors, so the board is fully diverse
  2. BDiversity of thought, background and experience reduces groupthink and improves challenge on ESG risks, so demographic diversity alone is not enoughCorrect
  3. CDiversity matters only for independent directors, not for executive directors
  4. DDiversity is a matter solely for the company's marketing and has no link to risk oversight

Explanation

Board diversity covers gender, age, skills, experience and perspective. A board with similar backgrounds and long shared tenure may suffer groupthink and challenge ESG risks weakly, even if demographic mix is good. Limiting diversity to the count of women or to independent directors misses this point.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Board's Accountability on ESG shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Board's Accountability on ESGFree diagnostic mock

More Board's Accountability on ESG questions