CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Commercial Contract Management
Tara sues Uday for specific performance of a written contract for sale of a flat, and also prays in the alternative that, if specific enforcement is refused, the contract be rescinded and delivered up. The court refuses specific performance. Which statement is correct under the Specific Relief Act, 1963?
The court may direct that the contract be rescinded and delivered up to be cancelled. Section 29 of the Specific Relief Act lets the plaintiff in a specific performance suit on a written contract pray for rescission in the alternative, without a fresh suit.
- AThe court may direct rescission and delivery up for cancellation, as the alternative prayer permitsCorrect
- BThe court must dismiss the suit because rescission cannot be sought in the same suit
- CThe court may rescind only if Uday consents
- DRescission is available only if a fresh suit is filed
Explanation
Section 29 allows a plaintiff suing for specific performance of a written contract to pray in the alternative for rescission, and the court, if it refuses specific enforcement, may direct rescission and delivery up accordingly. No fresh suit or defendant consent is required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Commercial Contract Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Commercial Contract Management questions
- Sunita Exports promises to pay Dev Rs 2,00,000 if a specified cargo ship returns to Mumbai within one year. Four months later the ship is bu…
- Bhavna Exports Ltd. contracted with Chetan Traders through an agent, and Chetan neither knew nor had reason to suspect that the agent was ac…
- Vihaan Constructions agreed to build a warehouse for Surya Estates for Rs 50 lakh. Vihaan was ready and willing to start, but Surya Estates …
- Nisha Foods owes Rs 10 lakh to Gupta Suppliers. By a tripartite agreement among Nisha Foods, Gupta Suppliers and Omkar Retail, Gupta Supplie…
- Under an indemnity from Orion Pharma, Tanvi is sued by a distributor. Without Orion's orders against it, and in a way a prudent person would…
- Meghna Textiles Ltd. agrees to pay Rohan Logistics Rs 4,00,000 if a particular consignment of cotton, stored in a third party's warehouse, i…