Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Leader · Audit and compliance

Tarvick Group has a unitary board where the chief executive is also chair. The audit committee has two non-executive directors, one of whom was Tarvick's finance director until two years ago. Shareholders have raised concerns. Applying a principles-based approach to governance, what is the most appropriate implication?

Under a principles-based, comply-or-explain approach, Tarvick may depart from code provisions but must disclose the departures and justify why its governance still meets the code's objectives. The combined CEO/chair role and a recently employed former finance director on the committee will face shareholder challenge.

  1. ATarvick must comply with every code provision or face automatic legal penalties
  2. BTarvick may depart from provisions but must explain the departure and justify why its governance still achieves the code's aimsCorrect
  3. CTarvick need take no action because the committee has non-executives
  4. DTarvick should adopt rules-based legislation that prohibits all non-executive directors with prior employment

Explanation

A principles-based approach, such as comply or explain, allows flexibility but requires disclosure and justification for departures. Here the CEO/chair combination and a recently employed former finance director on the committee are departures from good practice that shareholders will challenge. Automatic penalties describe a rules-based approach, and the presence of non-executives alone does not ensure independence.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Audit and compliance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Audit and compliance questions