IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis · Estimation procedures for lifetime distributions
Ten lives are observed from birth under an exponential model with force of mortality μ. Four die, at times 2, 3, 5 and 6 years. The other six are withdrawn alive at the end of year 8 (Type I censoring). What is the maximum likelihood estimate of μ?
The estimate is 0.0625. The exponential MLE equals the number of deaths divided by total observed time. Total time is 16 for the deaths plus 48 for the six censored lives, giving 64 years, so 4/64 equals 0.0625.
- A4/64 = 0.0625Correct
- B4/16 = 0.2500
- C4/48 = 0.0833
- D4/10 = 0.4000
- 6/64 = 0.0938
Explanation
The MLE is deaths divided by total time exposed. Total exposure = 2+3+5+6 + 6×8 = 16 + 48 = 64 years. Deaths = 4, so μ-hat = 4/64 = 0.0625. Using only the 48 years of censored lives, or only deaths' times, ignores part of the exposure.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimation procedures for lifetime distributions shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimation procedures for lifetime distributions questions
- An insurer studies mortality using only policies that were in force on 1 January 2020, with ages recorded at that date. Lives who died befor…
- Three lives with a single binary covariate z are observed. Life A (z=1) dies at time 1, life B (z=0) dies at time 2, and life C (z=0) is cen…
- In the Cox proportional hazards model h(t; z) = h0(t) exp(βz), what is the key property that makes the model 'proportional hazards'?
- In the Kaplan-Meier estimator, a life censored at time t, where a death also occurs at the same time t, is normally treated in which way?
- In a mortality investigation of a group of lives, the central exposed to risk E^c_x is best described as:
- Which statement correctly describes how the Nelson-Aalen estimate of the cumulative hazard, Λ̂(t), is used to obtain a survival function est…