CS Professional · Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Law and Practice · Debt Recovery and Securitization
The Appellate Tribunal, on Nila ARC's application under section 5A of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, transferred all pending applications against a borrower to the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Chennai. The transferor Tribunal at Pune contends that the order does not bind it because the Pune Tribunal is not within the order-making Appellate Tribunal's territorial jurisdiction. Which statement is correct?
The order binds every Tribunal concerned, including Pune, as if passed by the Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction over each. Section 5A(3) says so notwithstanding the 1993 Act. Any recovery certificate from the transferee Tribunal is executed under section 19(23) and other provisions of the 1993 Act.
- AThe order binds all the Tribunals concerned as if passed by the Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction over each, and any recovery certificate from the transferee Tribunal is executed under section 19(23) of the 1993 ActCorrect
- BThe order binds only the Tribunal within the Appellate Tribunal's own territorial jurisdiction
- CThe order binds the Pune Tribunal only if the borrower consents to the transfer
- DThe recovery certificate issued by the Chennai Tribunal must be executed only by the Pune Tribunal
Explanation
Section 5A(3) provides that, notwithstanding the 1993 Act, the order binds all the Debts Recovery Tribunals referred to as if passed by the Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction on each. Section 5A(4) says any recovery certificate issued by the transferee Tribunal is executed under sub-section (23) of section 19 and other provisions of the 1993 Act. The territorial objection and the consent condition therefore fail.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Debt Recovery and Securitization shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Debt Recovery and Securitization questions
- Sunrise Textiles Pvt Ltd, Surat, owes Bank of Baroda a debt that the Debts Recovery Tribunal determined at Rs 4 crore under section 19. Sunr…
- During hearing of a section 17 application by Narmada Exports, the DRT wants to examine a bank officer on oath, call for loan documents, and…
- Under the Act's definition of 'security interest', which of the following is expressly included in addition to a mortgage, charge, hypotheca…
- Canara Fin, a financial institution, sold to Vega ARC (a registered reconstruction company) a non-performing loan to Dev Plastics. The loan …
- Sunrise Textiles Pvt Ltd (Surat) defaulted on a secured loan. On 3 March, Western Bank took possession of the mortgaged factory under the SA…
- Lotus Steels Ltd appeals to the Tribunal against a Recovery Officer's order under section 30. It argues that, as with appeals under section …