IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Run-off triangles
The Bornhuetter-Ferguson ultimate can be written as Z times the chain ladder ultimate plus (1 - Z) times the a priori ultimate. If p is the proportion of ultimate developed to date, what is Z?
Z equals p, the proportion developed. Since claims to date equal p times the chain ladder ultimate, the BF ultimate is p times chain ladder plus (1 - p) times the a priori ultimate, so credibility rises as the year matures.
- AZ = 1 - p
- BZ = 1/p
- CZ = pCorrect
- DZ = p squared
- Z = 0.5 for all development years
Explanation
Let C be claims to date and U the a priori ultimate. BF = C + (1-p)U. Chain ladder = C/p, so C = p x CL. Then BF = p x CL + (1-p)U, so Z = p. As the year matures, p rises toward 1 and BF approaches the chain ladder.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Run-off triangles shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Run-off triangles questions
- An actuary applies the average cost per claim method to a run-off triangle. Which combination of inputs does this method project separately …
- A cumulative triangle has two accident years with data at development years 0 and 1: AY2023 (Rs 200 lakh, Rs 260 lakh) and AY2024 (Rs 300 la…
- Which practical check is most appropriate before relying on a chain-ladder projection of a claims triangle?
- Compared with the basic chain ladder method, why is the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method often preferred for the most recent, immature accident y…
- Compared with the basic chain ladder, which feature is an advantage of the inflation-adjusted chain ladder when claims inflation varies by c…
- A cumulative paid claims triangle (Rs lakh) for accident years 2022 and 2023 shows: 2022: 100 at development year 0, 150 at year 1. 2023: 12…