CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Legislative Framework of Corporate Governance in India
The Central Government wants to appoint Mr. Rao, a retired Chief Justice of a High Court, as a Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal, and Ms. Iyer, a chartered accountant with 26 years of experience in investment and accountancy, as a Technical Member. Which statement correctly describes the process and eligibility under the Companies Act, 2013?
Mr. Rao, as a Judicial Member, is appointed after consultation with the Chief Justice of India and qualifies as a former High Court Judge. Ms. Iyer, as a Technical Member, is appointed on the Selection Committee's recommendation and qualifies with at least twenty-five years of relevant experience.
- ABoth are appointed on the Selection Committee's recommendation; Mr. Rao is eligible as a person who has been a High Court Judge
- BMr. Rao is appointed after consultation with the Chief Justice of India and is eligible as a person who has been a High Court Judge; Ms. Iyer is appointed on the Selection Committee's recommendation and is eligible with over twenty-five years of relevant experienceCorrect
- CMr. Rao is appointed on the Selection Committee's recommendation; Ms. Iyer is appointed after consultation with the Chief Justice of India
- DMs. Iyer is ineligible because a Technical Member needs experience of at least thirty years
Explanation
Judicial Members of the Appellate Tribunal are appointed after consultation with the Chief Justice of India (s. 412(1)) and may be persons who are or have been High Court Judges (s. 411(2)). Technical Members are appointed on the Selection Committee's recommendation (s. 412(2)) and need proven ability and not less than twenty-five years of experience in the listed fields (s. 411(3)). Ms. Iyer's 26 years in investment and accountancy qualifies.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Legislative Framework of Corporate Governance in India shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Legislative Framework of Corporate Governance in India questions
- Nimbus Corp, a body corporate incorporated abroad, carried on business in India and has ceased to do so. It has since been dissolved in its …
- Suppose NFRA has not yet been constituted under section 132. Kaveri Foods Ltd asks which body the Central Government consults before prescri…
- Lotus Textiles Ltd., incorporated in Mauritius, has a place of business in Surat. Which statement about its documents obligations is correct…
- Arbor Foods GmbH, a German company with a Chennai branch, changes its authorised representative in India on 10 March. Under the Companies Ac…
- Consider the proviso to Section 133, inserted w.e.f. 1 April 2015. Until the NFRA is constituted under section 132, the Central Government m…
- Kaveri Global Pte. Ltd., incorporated in Singapore, has 60% of its paid-up share capital (equity and preference together) held by Indian cit…