CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Competition Law
The Commission concludes that a notified merger between Bharat Cements Ltd and Deccan Binders Ltd is likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition. Which direction does Section 31(2) require the Commission to give?
The Commission shall direct that the combination shall not take effect. Section 31(2) makes this the consequence where the combination has, or is likely to have, an appreciable adverse effect on competition. It is a mandatory direction, not an approval or deemed approval.
- AThat the combination shall not take effectCorrect
- BThat the combination be approved with a penalty
- CThat the parties re-notify after 150 days
- DThat the combination be treated as deemed approved
Explanation
Section 31(2) states that where the Commission is of the opinion that the combination has, or is likely to have, an appreciable adverse effect on competition, it shall direct that the combination shall not take effect. Deemed approval arises only from lapse of time or non-formation of a prima facie opinion, not from an adverse finding.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Competition Law shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Competition Law questions
- Kaveri Telecom, a dominant enterprise in the broadband market, sells its services only to customers who also agree to buy an unrelated cold-…
- Rohit, a law student, is asked about the territorial reach of the Competition Act, 2002 as it stands in the India Code text. Which statement…
- Ms. Kavita Rao is being considered for appointment as a Member of the CCI. She has 12 years of experience in competition law and policy and …
- The Government of a State is framing a policy on licensing of agricultural produce markets and wants to know how it may affect competition. …
- Which statement about the procedure and powers of the Appellate Tribunal under the Competition Act, 2002 is correct?
- Rohan Steels Ltd. deliberately and without any reasonable ground disobeys an order of the Appellate Tribunal. Which statement about the cons…