CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Procedural Compliance under GST
The Commissioner begins an audit of Kaveri Foods Pvt Ltd under section 65 of the CGST Act, 2017. The records called for were made available on 10 June, but the officers actually began the audit at the company's premises on 20 June. The Commissioner is satisfied that the audit cannot be finished in the basic period and extends it to the longest period allowed. Counting from the commencement of audit, what is the maximum total period for completion?
Nine months from 20 June. Commencement of audit is the later of the date records are made available and the actual start of audit at the premises, so 20 June applies. The basic three months can be extended by up to six more months.
- AThree months from 10 June plus six months
- BThree months from 20 June plus six months, i.e. nine months in allCorrect
- CThree months from 20 June plus three months
- DNine months from 10 June
Explanation
The Explanation to section 65(4) treats commencement as the later of the date records are made available or actual institution of audit, so 20 June. The basic period is three months, extendable by up to six months for recorded reasons, giving a maximum of nine months from 20 June. Using 10 June takes the earlier date, which is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Procedural Compliance under GST shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Procedural Compliance under GST questions
- Under section 35 of the CGST Act, 2017, which of the following persons must maintain records of the consigner, consignee and other relevant …
- An officer of the rank of Assistant Commissioner, during scrutiny, forms the opinion that credit availed is not within normal limits and wan…
- Sharma Metals Ltd contravenes a provision of the CGST Act for which the Act specifies a penalty of a fixed percentage of tax, say 10% of tax…
- An officer proposes a penalty on Sharma Enterprises for a documentation mistake that is an error apparent on the face of record, made withou…
- As per section 149 of the CGST Act, 2017, which statement about the compliance rating score is correct?
- A registered supplier issued a tax invoice with taxable value Rs 2,00,000 but the correct taxable value was Rs 2,20,000. Which statement is …