CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Law relating to Trade Marks
The Commissioner of Customs suspects that notified goods imported by Kaveri Imports bear a false trade mark and requires the importer to produce documents and give details of the consignor and the Indian consignee. Kaveri Imports does not comply within the prescribed period. What is the consequence under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 as it now stands?
The importer must comply within fourteen days; failing that, he is liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, levied and recovered by the authority designated under the Customs Act, 1962. It is a monetary penalty, not imprisonment under the false trade mark offence provisions.
- AImprisonment of six months with a minimum fine of fifty thousand rupees
- BPenalty of ten thousand rupees after non-compliance within fourteen days, levied under the Customs Act authorityCorrect
- CPenalty of two lakh rupees imposed directly by the Registrar
- DNo consequence, since the requirement is only advisory
Explanation
Section 140(3) requires compliance within fourteen days, failing which the importer is liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, levied and recovered by the authority under the Customs Act, 1962. The imprisonment and fine in the first option belong to sections 103 and 104 and do not apply here.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Trade Marks shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Trade Marks questions
- An international registration of a trade mark was made at the International Bureau. Under Section 36G, what are its duration and the grace p…
- Vikram is prosecuted for infringing registered mark 'ZENITH'. He pleads that the registration is invalid, and the court finds the defence pr…
- Ravi Textiles sells shirts under the unregistered label 'RaviStyle'. A rival begins selling shirts under a deceptively similar label. Ravi T…
- In an infringement suit, the court finds that the defendant, Kiran Traders, began using a similar mark without knowing, or having reasonable…
- Under Chapter IVA of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, an Indian firm files an application under section 18 for registration of its mark and then u…
- Anand Textiles' registered mark expired on 1 January 2025 and was removed from the register for non-payment of the renewal fee. When may the…