FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects
Two portfolios with the same counterparty are netted under one agreement. Trade A has an expected positive exposure of 30 million and trade B has 20 million. Which statement about the netted exposure is most accurate?
Netted exposure cannot exceed the sum of standalone exposures, and the netting benefit shrinks as trade values become more positively correlated. With perfect positive correlation there is little offset, while negative correlation gives the largest reduction.
- AIt equals the sum of the two exposures, 50 million, regardless of correlation
- BIt is always at least as large as the larger standalone exposure
- CIt is never greater than the sum of the standalone exposures, and the benefit is smaller when trade values are highly positively correlatedCorrect
- DIt is zero if the trades have opposite signs of delta
Explanation
Netted exposure is at most the sum of standalone exposures. Netting benefit is greatest when trade values are negatively correlated and falls toward zero as correlation approaches +1. Netted exposure may be below the larger standalone exposure, so the second option is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects questions
- A bank and a hedge fund trade under an ISDA-style master agreement with close-out netting. The hedge fund defaults. Which statement best des…
- A bank has n identical trades with a counterparty, each with the same exposure volatility and pairwise correlation rho between trade values,…
- Bank B and Fund F have two netting sets under separate master agreements. Netting set 1 has a net value of +20 million to Bank B; netting se…
- Under a netting agreement enforceable in the relevant jurisdiction, Bank A has three terminated trades with a defaulting counterparty. The c…
- In insolvency law, how does set-off differ from close-out netting as risk mitigants for a creditor?
- A risk manager reviews the valuation timing in close-out netting. Which feature is typically a source of valuation risk that makes the close…