CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Laws and Business Communication · Legal Methods and Court System in India
Two sections of an Act appear to conflict: Section X gives a tribunal power to grant interim relief, while Section Y bars any interim relief once an appeal is filed. The court interprets both so that each has effect and neither makes the other useless. Which rule of interpretation is being applied?
The court is applying harmonious construction. When provisions of one Act seem to conflict, the court reads them together in a way that gives effect to both and avoids making either section meaningless or redundant.
- AHarmonious constructionCorrect
- BLiteral rule
- CMischief rule
- DNoscitur a sociis
Explanation
Harmonious construction applies when provisions of the same statute seem to conflict; the court reads them together so that each is given effect and none is rendered redundant. The literal rule would simply follow words of one section, and the mischief rule studies the defect in earlier law. Noscitur a sociis explains a word by its neighbouring words, not conflicts between sections.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Legal Methods and Court System in India shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Legal Methods and Court System in India questions
- A trading association has followed a practice for decades. A dispute arises and one party relies on it. Which condition must the practice sa…
- Which statement about the distinction between public and private law is correct?
- A shopkeeper argues in court that a buyer who examined goods and chose them cannot later complain of defects that a reasonable inspection wo…
- Which of the following is an example of subordinate (delegated) legislation as a source of law?
- Sunita Traders sues Kapoor Enterprises for refusing to pay for goods delivered under a written agreement. Which feature best shows that this…
- Which of the following correctly lists the courts in descending order of authority within a State's regular judicial hierarchy?