FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Correlation Basics: Definitions, Applications, and Terminology
Two variables have the following five paired observations: X = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and Y = 1, 4, 9, 16, 25. What is the Spearman rank correlation, and how does it compare with the Pearson correlation?
Spearman is exactly 1.0 and Pearson is below 1.0. Y rises strictly with X, so the ranks match perfectly. The relationship is quadratic rather than linear, so Pearson is high, about 0.98, but not perfect.
- ASpearman is 1.0; Pearson is below 1.0Correct
- BSpearman is below 1.0; Pearson is 1.0
- CSpearman is 1.0; Pearson is also exactly 1.0
- DSpearman is 0.0; Pearson is above 0.9
Explanation
Y increases strictly with X, so the ranks are identical (1 to 5) and the rank correlation is exactly 1. The relationship is convex, not linear, so Pearson is high (about 0.98) but below 1. Option C wrongly assumes a monotonic relationship is linear.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Correlation Basics: Definitions, Applications, and Terminology shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Correlation Basics: Definitions, Applications, and Terminology questions
- A portfolio manager observes that two assets have a Pearson correlation near zero, and concludes the assets are statistically independent. W…
- Which feature best distinguishes a correlation swap from a variance swap used to trade implied correlation?
- A portfolio holds two positions with standalone one-day 99% VaRs of USD 3 million and USD 4 million. Assuming normally distributed returns a…
- A portfolio manager observes that a stock index and a volatility index have a Pearson correlation of -0.80 over a calm period, and states th…
- In a Gaussian copula model of default for a credit portfolio, a risk manager raises the pairwise default correlation from 0.10 to 0.50 while…
- A dealer sells a correlation swap paying realized average correlation on a basket of three stocks. The pairwise realized correlations are 0.…