CS Professional · Banking and Insurance - Laws and Practice · Control over Organization of Banks
Under a sanctioned scheme of amalgamation of Narmada Bank Ltd. into Ganga Bank Ltd. under Section 45, 200 workmen of Narmada Bank are to continue in service. Which statement about their employment is correct?
The workmen continue in the transferee bank on the same pay and terms they had just before the moratorium order. The scheme must also provide that within three years of sanction, the transferee bank grants terms applicable to employees of corresponding rank or status.
- AThey continue in the transferee bank on the same remuneration and terms they had just before the date of the moratorium order, with a provision for parity with corresponding employees of the transferee bank within three yearsCorrect
- BThey are automatically dismissed and must reapply to the transferee bank
- CThey continue at the transferee bank's pay scales from day one, regardless of earlier terms
- DThey continue on the same terms permanently, with no later parity with the transferee bank's employees
Explanation
Section 45(5)(i) continues services at the same remuneration and terms as before the moratorium order. The proviso requires that, within three years of sanction, the transferee bank grants terms applicable to employees of corresponding rank or status, subject to equivalent qualifications and experience. Permanent freezing is therefore wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Control over Organization of Banks shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Control over Organization of Banks questions
- The Central Government ordered a moratorium on Sagar Bank Ltd for 2 months and later extended it twice by 2 months each. A further extension…
- Three investors agree informally to each buy 2% of Deccan Bank Ltd so that together they obtain 6% and influence its board. Each individuall…
- Malwa Bank Ltd increases its authorised capital, so that its existing subscribed and paid-up capital no longer satisfy the Section 12(1)(i) …
- During a valid moratorium on Kaveri Bank Ltd., a depositor, Mr. Iyer, demands full repayment of his fixed deposit of Rs 4,00,000. No directi…
- Mr. Rao, who holds no shares in Sahyadri Bank Ltd, plans to buy shares that would give him 4% of its paid-up capital. His wife already holds…
- A corresponding new bank proposes to commit to a loan to a company that is not a Government company, in which the Central Government holds 4…