CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Foreign Direct Investments - Regulations and Policy
Under FEMA, an authorised dealer bank handling inward FDI remittances ignores a Reserve Bank direction on reporting and also fails to file a return the Reserve Bank had directed it to file. What is the maximum penalty framework the Reserve Bank may impose after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard?
The Reserve Bank may impose a penalty up to ten thousand rupees on the authorised person, plus up to two thousand rupees for every day a continuing contravention lasts, after a reasonable hearing. This follows section 11(3) of FEMA for breach of directions or failure to file returns.
- AUp to ten thousand rupees, and for continuing contravention an additional amount up to two thousand rupees for each day it continuesCorrect
- BUp to two thousand rupees, and for continuing contravention an additional amount up to ten thousand rupees per day
- CUp to ten thousand rupees only, with no additional amount for continuing contravention
- DPenalty equal to thrice the sum involved in the remittance
Explanation
Section 11(3) provides for a penalty which may extend to ten thousand rupees and, for continuing contravention, an additional penalty up to two thousand rupees per day. The second option reverses the figures. The third ignores the continuing-contravention component, and the fourth is a sum-based penalty not found in section 11(3).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Foreign Direct Investments - Regulations and Policy shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Foreign Direct Investments - Regulations and Policy questions
- A foreign investor proposes an equity investment in an Indian company, which is a capital account transaction not involving debt instruments…
- A foreign company, Altona GmbH, plans to open a liaison office in Pune. Which statement correctly reflects FEMA on establishing a branch, of…
- Anand, a person resident outside India, inherited shares of an Indian company from his late uncle, who was resident in India. Anand wishes t…
- Under FEMA, the Reserve Bank wants to verify the correctness of a statement furnished by an authorised person about its foreign investment r…
- Ravi's overseas property was seized in equivalent value in India under section 37A and the seizure was confirmed. During adjudication he dis…
- Meridian Agro Pvt Ltd, an Indian company, wants to know which authority prescribes the permissible classes of capital account transactions t…