ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Quality management (firm and engagement level)
Under ISA 220 (Revised), which of the following best describes the engagement partner's responsibility for direction, supervision and review of the audit work?
The engagement partner takes overall responsibility for managing and achieving quality on the audit. That includes setting the nature, timing and extent of direction, supervision and review, and personally reviewing critical areas of judgement. It does not require reviewing every working paper, nor can it be fully delegated.
- AReview responsibility may be delegated entirely to the manager if the partner has signed the engagement letter
- BThe partner must personally review all audit working papers
- CThe partner must take overall responsibility for managing and achieving quality, including determining the nature, timing and extent of direction, supervision and review in line with the firm's policies, and reviewing critical areas of judgementCorrect
- DThe partner is responsible only for the final audit opinion; quality of the team's work is the firm's responsibility
Explanation
ISA 220 (Revised) makes the engagement partner responsible for overall quality on the engagement, including appropriate direction, supervision and review, with review of significant matters and significant judgements. It does not require personal review of all working papers, and review cannot be wholly delegated. Responsibility is not limited to the opinion or shifted to the firm.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Quality management (firm and engagement level) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Quality management (firm and engagement level) questions
- Dunmore Audit has a quality risk that engagement teams lack sufficient time to perform audits properly during the busy season. Management mo…
- Dunmore LLP audits Corvane Ltd, a listed entity. The engagement partner has served as key audit partner for six consecutive years. Corvane's…
- Kestrel & Co's root cause analysis shows that several engagement files lacked adequate evidence on inventory counts because staff were overl…
- Brightwell LLP performs an annual monitoring review. The reviewers found that on three of ten sampled audits, the engagement partner did not…
- Kestrel & Moss is auditing Orlin Holdings, a listed entity. The EQR, Dev Anand, reviewing the file, identifies that the engagement team acce…
- During the engagement quality review of Orinoco Telecom, the reviewer, Dev, notes that the engagement team concluded a major revenue recogni…