CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Intellectual Property Rights
Under section 21 of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, two authorised users hold registered geographical indications that are identical or nearly resemble each other. Which statement is correct about their exclusive right to use?
Neither authorised user acquires the exclusive right against the other merely by registration, except as conditions or limitations on the register provide. Section 21(3) of the GI Act, 1999 adds that each still has against other persons the rights of a sole authorised user.
- AThe first user to register acquires the exclusive right against the other by registration alone
- BNeither acquires the exclusive right against the other merely by registration, subject to conditions or limitations on the registerCorrect
- CBoth lose all rights and the registrations are cancelled automatically
- DThe right against the other passes to the registered proprietor, not the users
Explanation
Section 21(3) states that where authorised users hold identical or nearly resembling indications, exclusive use is not deemed acquired by any one of them as against another merely by registration, except as conditions or limitations entered on the register provide. Each has the same rights against others as a sole authorised user would have. The first option wrongly gives priority by registration.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Intellectual Property Rights shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Intellectual Property Rights questions
- Mehta and Iyer are registered co-proprietors of a patent, with no agreement between them. Mehta wishes to grant a licence under the patent t…
- The registration of Sundaram Toys' design lapsed and was later restored. During the gap, a rival, Kavya Toys, copied the design. Under the D…
- Meera, a Pune lyricist, wants a body to issue licences for her songs and collect licence fees on her behalf. Under the Copyright Act, 1957, …
- Dev and Esha are registered co-proprietors of a patent. Dev sells a patented article to Farhan, who then resells it. Esha objects that she d…
- Rohan, a Delhi composer, authorised a copyright society to administer his rights, but later wishes to take back control. Under the Copyright…
- An Indian copyright society wishes to tie up with a foreign society for administering rights in each other's territory. Under the Copyright …