CS Executive · Company Law and Practice · Compromise, Arrangement and Amalgamations - Concepts
Under Section 230, the Tribunal may dispense with calling a meeting of a class of creditors if the creditors confirm the scheme by affidavit. What minimum value of such creditors must agree?
The Tribunal may dispense with the meeting where creditors holding at least ninety per cent in value agree to the scheme and confirm it by affidavit. The seventy-five per cent figure applies to voting at a meeting.
- AAt least 51% in value
- BAt least 75% in value
- CAt least 90% in valueCorrect
- D100% in number
Explanation
Section 230(9) lets the Tribunal dispense with a creditors' meeting where creditors or the class, having at least ninety per cent value, agree and confirm by affidavit. The 75% figure is the voting majority in value at a meeting under sub-section (6), not the threshold for dispensing with it.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Compromise, Arrangement and Amalgamations - Concepts shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Compromise, Arrangement and Amalgamations - Concepts questions
- Mehta Textiles Ltd and Sharma Fabrics Ltd propose a merger under Section 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The last annual accounts of Sharma …
- Sagar Pharma Ltd proposes a scheme that includes a takeover offer and a buy-back of its securities. A director asks what section 230 says ab…
- Which of the following sets of facts alone is sufficient, under section 231(2), for the Tribunal to order winding up of a company whose sche…
- Tribunal could modify Ganga Steels Ltd's sanctioned scheme but the company is still able to pay its debts as per the scheme, though implemen…
- A scheme sanctioned for Mahanadi Foods Ltd cannot be implemented satisfactorily even with modifications, and the company cannot pay its debt…
- Kapoor Pharma Ltd, a listed company, merges into Iyer Labs Pvt Ltd, an unlisted company, under a Section 232 scheme. Which statement correct…