Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Financial Management · Corporate environmental, social, governance (ESG) and ethical issues

Under the agency relationship between shareholders and managers, which of the following is the most likely way that a conflict of interest with a wider stakeholder group, such as the local community, is mitigated in a multinational that aims to maximise shareholder wealth?

Embedding sustainability targets in long-term executive pay best mitigates stakeholder conflict, because managers' rewards become tied to environmental and social outcomes as well as financial returns. Short-term earnings-based bonuses, weaker boards or less reporting would increase the conflict rather than reduce it.

  1. ALinking management bonuses solely to short-term earnings per share
  2. BEmbedding sustainability-related targets in the long-term executive remuneration schemeCorrect
  3. CRemoving non-executive directors from the board
  4. DReducing the frequency of stakeholder reporting

Explanation

Including ESG targets in long-term remuneration aligns managers' rewards with outcomes that matter to stakeholders beyond shareholders. Short-term EPS bonuses tend to worsen the conflict by encouraging cost-cutting on environmental and social spending. Removing non-executives or reducing reporting weakens oversight and accountability.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate environmental, social, governance (ESG) and ethical issues shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Corporate environmental, social, governance (ESG) and ethical issues questions