CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Assessment and Audit
Under the CGST Rules, 2017, an officer directs Nilgiri Steels Ltd to get its records audited by a chartered accountant under section 66. Which pair of forms correctly represents the direction and the communication of findings of this special audit?
The direction for special audit is issued in FORM GST ADT-03 and the findings of the special audit are communicated in FORM GST ADT-04. ADT-01 is the audit notice and ADT-02 communicates ordinary audit findings under rule 101, so those pairings are wrong.
- AFORM GST ADT-01 for direction and ADT-02 for findings
- BFORM GST ADT-03 for direction and ADT-04 for findingsCorrect
- CFORM GST ADT-02 for direction and ADT-03 for findings
- DFORM GST ADT-04 for direction and ADT-01 for findings
Explanation
Rule 102(1) requires a direction in FORM GST ADT-03 to get records audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant specified in the direction. Rule 102(2) says findings are informed in FORM GST ADT-04. ADT-01 and ADT-02 belong to the ordinary audit under rule 101.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Assessment and Audit shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Assessment and Audit questions
- Nirmal Traders was a provisionally assessed person. The proper officer issued the final assessment order in FORM GST ASMT-07 on 10 June, and…
- The Assistant Commissioner issues a direction to Himalaya Foods Pvt. Ltd. under section 66 for special audit. The direction names a chartere…
- Ganga Traders, a taxable person, did not file returns. The proper officer issues a notice in FORM GST ASMT-14 on 1 March proposing a best ju…
- M/s Kaveri Textiles, Coimbatore, is a registered person. The proper officer decides to audit its records under section 65 of the CGST Act. W…
- Sundaram Textiles Pvt Ltd, registered in Tamil Nadu, receives a notice in FORM GST ADT-01 informing it that its records will be audited by t…
- Madhav Enterprises, a registered person, failed to file returns despite notice under section 46. The proper officer assessed its tax under s…