ACCA Applied Skills · Corporate and Business Law (Global) · Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both
Under the CISG, Tanto Co (buyer) has received goods from Vela Co (seller) but intends to reject them as non-conforming. Tanto Co is in possession of the goods and a decision on rejection is pending. Which statement about Tanto Co's duty is correct?
Tanto Co must take reasonable steps to preserve the goods and can recover its reasonable expenses from the seller. Intending to reject does not remove the duty to preserve. Sale is only required in cases of rapid deterioration or unreasonable preservation cost.
- AIt must take reasonable steps in the circumstances to preserve the goods, and may recover its reasonable expenses from the sellerCorrect
- BIt may leave the goods to deteriorate because it intends to reject them
- CIt must sell the goods immediately at any price to limit the loss
Explanation
A buyer in possession of goods it intends to reject must take reasonable steps to preserve them and is entitled to retain them until reimbursed its reasonable expenses by the seller. Letting them deteriorate breaches this duty. Sale is required only where goods are subject to rapid deterioration or preservation costs are unreasonable, not in every case.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both questions
- Under the CISG, Brandt GmbH is to deliver 12 monthly instalments of components to Vale Inc. The fourth delivery is defective, which gives Va…
- A seller in Country A agrees to sell machine parts to a buyer in Country B under a CISG contract. The contract requires the seller to hand t…
- Altura Ltd agreed to sell 500 machine parts to Brevik GmbH under a contract governed by the CISG. Altura delivered the parts, but they were …
- Garnet Ltd, a buyer under a CISG contract, refuses to take delivery of goods that the seller, Hollin Co, tendered on the agreed date and whi…
- Epsilon Ltd agreed to buy 1,000 units from Zeta Ltd at 50 per unit under a CISG contract. Zeta wrongly refuses to deliver. Epsilon avoids th…
- Iota Inc (buyer) receives goods from Kappa Ltd under a CISG contract. The goods are non-conforming, and Iota has a valid right to demand del…