Skip to content

CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · Preliminary

Under the Companies Act, 2013, Zenith Pvt Ltd has a paid-up share capital of Rs 3 crore and turnover of Rs 30 crore. Its holding company, Apex Ltd, owns 100% of it. Mr Bose, who sits on the board of Zenith, is asked whether Zenith can be a 'small company'. Which statement is correct?

Zenith cannot qualify as a small company because the statutory definition excludes holding companies and subsidiary companies, along with public companies, section 8 companies and companies under special Acts. Being a wholly owned subsidiary of Apex Ltd disqualifies it regardless of its paid-up capital or turnover.

  1. AIt cannot be a small company because a holding company or a subsidiary company is excluded from the definition of small companyCorrect
  2. BIt is a small company because its paid-up capital does not exceed the prescribed limit
  3. CIt is a small company because turnover is not a criterion
  4. DIt is a small company if the holding company is a public company

Explanation

The definition of small company excludes a public company, a holding company, a subsidiary company, a company registered under section 8, and a company governed by special Act. Zenith is a wholly owned subsidiary, so it is excluded irrespective of its capital and turnover. The other options ignore this exclusion.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Preliminary shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Preliminary questions