CS Executive · Setting Up of Business, Industrial and Labour Laws · Setting up of Business outside India and Issues Relating thereto
Varun Textiles Ltd remits foreign exchange to its overseas joint venture as a capital account transaction. Which statement matches Section 6 of FEMA regarding drawal of foreign exchange for amortisation of loans or depreciation of direct investments in the ordinary course of business?
No restrictions can be imposed on such drawal. The proviso to Section 6(2) bars both the Reserve Bank and the Central Government from restricting drawal of foreign exchange for payments due on amortisation of loans or depreciation of direct investments in the ordinary course of business.
- AThe Reserve Bank or Central Government shall not impose restrictions on drawal for such paymentsCorrect
- BThe Reserve Bank must cap such drawal at a prescribed limit every year
- CSuch drawal is prohibited for capital account transactions
- DSuch drawal needs prior approval of the Competent Authority
Explanation
The proviso to Section 6(2) says that neither the Reserve Bank nor the Central Government shall impose restrictions on drawal of foreign exchange for payment due on account of amortisation of loans or for depreciation of direct investments in the ordinary course of business. Capping or prohibiting it contradicts this proviso.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Setting up of Business outside India and Issues Relating thereto shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Setting up of Business outside India and Issues Relating thereto questions
- Under Section 37A of FEMA, an Authorised Officer suspects that foreign security worth a prescribed amount held abroad by Kabir breaches Sect…
- Arjun, resident in India, inherited a flat in Dubai from his uncle, who was resident outside India. Under Section 6 of FEMA, what is the pos…
- Mr. Arjun Bedi's assets in India were seized under section 37A and the seizure was confirmed. During adjudication he discloses the suspected…
- Kabir is found to have acquired foreign immovable property outside India, of aggregate value exceeding the threshold prescribed under the pr…
- The Authorised Officer suspects that Karan, resident in India, holds an undisclosed foreign property in breach of Section 4, and the propert…
- Kavita Rao is found to have acquired foreign immovable property worth more than the prescribed threshold under the proviso to section 37A(1)…