Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Analysis and interpretation of financial and non-financial information and measurement of performance

Vela Co's finance director wishes to improve reported gearing before a loan covenant test by reclassifying redeemable preference shares with a mandatory redemption date as equity. Debt is $300m and equity is $600m, and the preference shares are $100m. Under IFRS Accounting Standards, what is the correct response?

The shares must be classified as a financial liability because redemption is mandatory, creating a contractual obligation to pay cash. Debt becomes $400m and debt to equity is 66.7%. Presenting them as equity to flatter a covenant would be misleading and unethical.

  1. AAccept the reclassification, since the legal form is share capital
  2. BClassify the shares as a financial liability, giving debt of $400m and gearing (debt to equity) of 66.7% on equity of $600mCorrect
  3. CClassify half as equity and half as liability to reflect uncertainty
  4. DClassify as equity but disclose the redemption in the notes

Explanation

Shares with a mandatory redemption requirement create a contractual obligation to deliver cash, so IAS 32 requires liability classification. Debt rises to $400m and gearing is 400/600 = 66.7% if equity is unchanged at $600m, and presenting them as equity would be misleading and raise an ethical concern. Splitting them equally has no basis in the standard.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Analysis and interpretation of financial and non-financial information and measurement of performance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Analysis and interpretation of financial and non-financial information and measurement of performance questions