Skip to content

FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · The Governance of Risk Management

Which compensation design is most consistent with sound risk governance for senior risk takers at a financial institution?

Deferring part of variable pay over several years and subjecting it to clawback if risk outcomes deteriorate best fits sound governance. It aligns incentives with long-term risk results. Upfront revenue-based bonuses or short-term share price targets reward excessive risk-taking because the costs appear only later.

  1. ALarge annual cash bonuses based on current-year revenue, paid entirely upfront
  2. BA portion of variable pay deferred over several years and subject to clawback if risk outcomes prove poorCorrect
  3. CFixed salary only, with no link to firm performance
  4. DBonuses tied exclusively to short-term share price increases

Explanation

Deferral and clawback align pay with the longer-term realization of risk, reducing incentives to take hidden tail risks for short-term gains. Upfront revenue-based bonuses and short-term share-price links reward risk-taking without penalty. Fixed-only pay is not the recognized best-practice design, since variable pay adjusted for risk is expected.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on The Governance of Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More The Governance of Risk Management questions