ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Financial Management · Regulatory framework and processes
Which defence is most likely to be classed as a pre-bid (structural) defence, rather than a defence implemented after an offer has been made?
Staggered board terms and supermajority voting requirements for a merger are pre-bid defences. They are built into the company's constitution before any offer to make control harder to obtain, whereas defence documents, Pac-Man counter-bids and white knights are used only in response to an actual bid.
- AIssuing a defence document that argues the offer undervalues the company
- BIntroducing staggered board terms and supermajority voting requirements for a mergerCorrect
- CMaking a counter-bid for the bidder (Pac-Man defence)
- DPersuading a white knight to make a rival offer
Explanation
Staggered boards and supermajority clauses are put into the constitution in advance to make a hostile takeover harder. The other options are all reactions taken once an offer has been made.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regulatory framework and processes shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regulatory framework and processes questions
- Under the UK Takeover Code's general approach, which action may the board of an offeree company take after it has received a bona fide offer…
- Alpha plc plans to acquire Beta plc. Beta's stand-alone value is $400m. Synergies are valued at $60m. The authority will clear the deal only…
- In the context of merger control, a competition authority carries out a 'Phase 1' review of a proposed acquisition. Which of the following b…
- A competition authority is assessing a proposed merger between two suppliers of industrial components. Which of the following factors would …
- Following an unwelcome takeover approach, the board of Target plc sells its most profitable division so that the bidder loses the attraction…
- A merger is notified to a competition authority that operates a two-phase review. What typically happens in a Phase 2 investigation?