CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Laws and Business Communication · Consideration and Legality of Object
Which fact situation is covered by the second limb of Section 24, namely 'any one or any part of any one of several considerations for a single object' being unlawful?
The situation with two payments for a single job, one of which is for an immoral purpose, is covered. The second limb of Section 24 applies when one of several considerations for a single object is unlawful. Then the agreement is void, just as in the first limb.
- AA pays one lump sum to B for a lawful sale and an unlawful agency
- BA promises two payments to B for a single lawful job, where one of the payments is for an immoral purposeCorrect
- CA agrees to sell a house to B and the price is unclear
- DA promises to pay B, if C fails to pay B
Explanation
The second limb involves several considerations for one object, where at least one consideration is unlawful. Two payments to B for a single job, one of them for an immoral purpose, fit that pattern. The first option reflects the first limb (single consideration, several objects). The uncertainty and conditional-promise cases fall under other sections.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Consideration and Legality of Object shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Consideration and Legality of Object questions
- Sunita promises to pay Rs 10,000 to Arjun if he will not sue her for a disputed debt, and Arjun agrees to abstain. Which view is correct und…
- Asha promises to pay Vikram ₹50,000 in return for two things, namely, delivering her goods to Kochi, which is lawful, and bribing a governme…
- Arjun found the lost wallet of Kiran, a stranger, and returned it without being asked. Later Kiran promised Arjun Rs. 500 for this act. Whic…
- Vijay owes Rs. 20,000 to Hari, but the debt is barred by the law of limitation. Vijay now signs a written promise to pay Hari Rs. 8,000 towa…
- Which of the following is an exception where the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that no consideration is necessary?
- Anil agrees to manage, for Seema, her lawful textile business and also an illegal trade in prohibited goods, for a single salary of ₹10,000 …