FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Evolution of Stress Testing Counterparty Exposures
Which feature distinguishes reverse stress testing of counterparty exposures from standard scenario-based stress testing?
Reverse stress testing begins with a specified unacceptable outcome, such as a loss that threatens viability, and works backward to identify the scenarios that could cause it. Standard stress testing instead starts with a chosen scenario and measures the resulting loss.
- AIt starts from a defined unacceptable loss and searches for the scenarios that would cause itCorrect
- BIt applies only the shocks prescribed by the regulator
- CIt estimates losses only under average market conditions
- DIt removes the need for senior management review of results
Explanation
Reverse stress testing works backward from a predefined failure or loss threshold to identify the combinations of events that could produce it, which can reveal vulnerabilities that forward scenarios miss. The other options describe unrelated or incorrect features.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Evolution of Stress Testing Counterparty Exposures shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Evolution of Stress Testing Counterparty Exposures questions
- A bank's counterparty stress test shows a stressed loss of USD 180 million from a single hedge fund counterparty. Stressed losses are limite…
- A bank has a netting set with a counterparty. Current exposure is 40 million. Under a stress scenario the mark-to-market of the netting set …
- A dealer's stress test of a portfolio of uncollateralised interest rate swaps with a hedge fund applies a 200 bp parallel rate shock and lea…
- A bank wants its counterparty stress testing to identify the scenarios that would be most damaging to the firm, without relying on analysts …
- A credit officer compares PFE and EPE for a counterparty. Which statement is most accurate about how these metrics are used?
- A bank simulates the mark-to-market value of a forward contract with a counterparty at one future date using five equally likely scenarios: …