Skip to content

CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Equity Analyst Research Reports

Which feature of a research report's recommendation section would an investor most likely view as strengthening the credibility of the investment thesis?

A discussion of the key risks that could cause the thesis to fail most strengthens credibility. It shows the analyst has considered what could invalidate the view, and lets readers judge the recommendation. Missing time horizons or targets equal to market price make a recommendation uninformative.

  1. AA rating with no stated time horizon to avoid being proven wrong
  2. BA discussion of the key risks that could cause the thesis to failCorrect
  3. CA target price that is always set at the current market price

Explanation

Credible reports link the rating to valuation, a time horizon, and the risks that could invalidate the thesis. Omitting a horizon or setting the target at the market price makes the recommendation untestable or uninformative.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Equity Analyst Research Reports shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Equity Analyst Research Reports questions