Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Governance

Which feature should a board-level operational risk report have to support effective governance?

A good board report is concise and forward-looking, linking key exposures, indicators and control weaknesses to risk appetite limits, with clear actions and owners. This helps directors make decisions, whereas excessive detail, backward-only totals or purely qualitative text weakens oversight.

  1. AExhaustive transaction-level loss detail so directors can verify every event
  2. BOnly backward-looking loss totals, to avoid speculation
  3. CConcise, forward-looking information linking key exposures, KRIs and control weaknesses to risk appetite limits, with clear actions and ownersCorrect
  4. DQualitative commentary without metrics, to avoid false precision

Explanation

Board reports should be concise and decision-useful, tying exposures and indicators to risk appetite and showing actions and ownership. Excessive detail obscures key messages, while purely historical or purely qualitative reports lack the insight needed for oversight.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Governance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Governance questions