Skip to content

ACCA Applied Knowledge · Business and Technology · Competitive factors

Which of the following best describes the risk of being 'stuck in the middle' in Porter's analysis?

Being stuck in the middle means a firm tries to be both low-cost and differentiated but achieves neither, so it earns below-average returns. A narrow-segment focus is a legitimate strategy and is not what Porter meant by this risk.

  1. AA firm that pursues both cost leadership and differentiation without achieving either, resulting in below-average returnsCorrect
  2. BA firm that operates in only one narrow market segment and so faces a limited customer base
  3. CA firm whose supply chain is located between suppliers and distributors and so lacks bargaining power
  4. DA firm that has diversified into unrelated markets and so lacks a clear core business

Explanation

Porter argued that firms failing to commit to one generic strategy end up with neither the low costs of a cost leader nor the distinctiveness of a differentiator, giving poor performance. The narrow segment option describes focus, which is a valid strategy, not being stuck in the middle.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Competitive factors shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Competitive factors questions