CMA Intermediate · Business Laws and Ethics · Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Which of the following indorsements by B, on an instrument payable to bearer, does NOT exclude the indorsee C's right of further negotiation, as per the illustrations to Section 50?
"Pay C value in account with the Oriental Bank" does not exclude further negotiation. The Section 50 illustrations list this form, along with "Pay C", as non-restrictive, whereas "for my use", "for the account of B" and "must be credited to C" exclude C's further negotiation.
- A"Pay C value in account with the Oriental Bank"Correct
- B"Pay C for my use"
- C"Pay C or order for the account of B"
- D"The within must be credited to C"
Explanation
Illustration (f) states that "Pay C value in account with the Oriental Bank" does not exclude further negotiation. The other three, illustrations (b), (c) and (d), are listed as excluding C's right of further negotiation.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 questions
- A promissory note is originally payable to 'Meena Iyer'. She indorses it in blank by merely signing on the back and hands it to Karan. Accor…
- Anil issued a cheque to Bharat in discharge of a debt. In a prosecution under Section 138 after dishonour for insufficient funds, Anil argue…
- Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, what is the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed on a drawer whose ch…
- In determining what is a reasonable time for giving notice of dishonour and for noting, which approach does the Act prescribe?
- Ravi Traders holds a bill of exchange that was dishonoured by non-payment. Which of the following is a correct statement about the steps of …
- Mehta Exports signs and delivers to Vikram a stamped paper that is wholly blank, and Vikram fills it in as a promissory note for an amount w…