CA Foundation · Accounting · Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes
Which of the following instruments is NOT a valid promissory note under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
The instrument promising to pay Rekha ₹10,000 only if she passes the CA Foundation exam is not a valid promissory note, because the promise is conditional. A promissory note must contain an unconditional undertaking to pay a certain sum of money.
- A"I promise to pay Rekha ₹10,000 if I pass the CA Foundation exam."Correct
- B"I promise to pay Rekha or order ₹10,000 on demand."
- C"I, Mahesh, promise to pay the bearer of this note ₹10,000 after 3 months."
- D"I, Mahesh, promise to pay Rekha ₹10,000 after 3 months for value received."
Explanation
A promissory note must contain an unconditional undertaking to pay a certain sum. Option 1 makes payment depend on passing an exam, which is uncertain, so it is conditional and invalid. Option 2 (on demand) and option 4 (fixed period) are unconditional. Option 3 is invalid for a different reason in law, as a note cannot be made payable to bearer, but option 1 is the clearly conditional one.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes questions
- A bill drawn on 31 December 2023 is payable 2 months after date. Under the rule of calendar months, what is the legal due date including gra…
- Asha Traders holds a bill of exchange for ₹80,000 accepted by Bhatia & Co. Asha Traders discounts it with its bank, which deducts ₹2,000 as …
- Suresh Agencies discounted a customer's bill of ₹50,000 with its bank for ₹49,000. On the due date the acceptor, Tiwari Ltd., dishonoured th…
- On receiving a duly accepted bill of exchange from a customer, Anil Traders (the drawer) in its books will:
- In a bill of exchange, the person who gives the unconditional order to pay a fixed sum of money is called the:
- Kiran & Co. endorsed to its supplier Lalit Bros. a bill for ₹36,000 that it had received from Mehta Ltd. in full settlement of the ₹36,000 i…