FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Calculating and Applying VaR
Which of the following is a correct statement about the parameters used to specify a VaR measure?
Raising the confidence level while keeping the horizon fixed increases VaR under a normal distribution, because the cutoff moves further into the tail and the z-value grows. Horizon scaling uses the square root of time, and longer horizons raise VaR.
- ARaising the confidence level while holding the horizon fixed increases VaR for a normal distributionCorrect
- BUnder the square-root-of-time rule, VaR over a longer horizon is the one-day VaR multiplied by the number of days
- CVaR is unaffected by the choice of holding period if returns have zero mean
- DA 95% VaR is always larger than a 99% VaR for the same portfolio
Explanation
A higher confidence level moves the cutoff further into the loss tail, so a larger z gives a larger VaR. The square-root rule multiplies by the square root of days, not days. VaR grows with the horizon even with zero mean, and 99% VaR exceeds 95% VaR.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Calculating and Applying VaR shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Calculating and Applying VaR questions
- A risk manager simulates a two-asset portfolio using Monte Carlo with correlated normal returns. Asset volatilities are 20% and 30% with cor…
- A risk manager compares methods for a portfolio that is short a large number of options and so has substantial negative gamma, with a large …
- A bank uses historical simulation with full revaluation to compute 1-day 99% VaR for an options portfolio using 500 daily scenarios. Which o…
- A firm has a 99% one-day VaR of 2 million. Assuming normally distributed returns and independent days, what is the approximate 99% ten-day V…
- Which statement best describes a limitation of VaR that expected shortfall (ES) addresses?
- A trader is short 500 call options on a stock trading at USD 100. Each option has delta 0.50 and gamma 0.03. The risk manager's worst-case o…