NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-X-B: Investment Adviser (Level 2) · Risk Profiling for Investors
Which of the following is a recognised limitation of relying only on a standard risk profiling questionnaire?
A questionnaire records the client's stated attitude at a single point in time, and responses can swing with recent market conditions, wording or misunderstanding. Advisers therefore supplement it with conversation and periodic reviews, and still need to understand goals and finances separately.
- AIt can never be used for documentation under regulations
- BIt may capture stated attitudes at one point in time, which can change with market conditionsCorrect
- CIt always overstates the client's financial capacity
- DIt removes the need to know the client's goals
Explanation
Questionnaires reflect responses at a given moment and can be influenced by recent market events, wording and the client's understanding. Therefore advisers supplement them with discussion and periodic review. They do not replace goal analysis, and they do not systematically overstate capacity.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Profiling for Investors shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Risk Profiling for Investors questions
- Under the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, what must an investment adviser do regarding risk profiling of a client?
- Under the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, what is an investment adviser required to do regarding a client's risk profile?
- In risk profiling of an investor, which of the following best describes 'risk capacity'?
- Mr. Arvind Menon, 58, a salaried manager in Pune, tells his adviser he is comfortable with large equity swings and wants 90% equity. He plan…
- Ms. Kavya Rao, 35, has a stable job, no dependants and a 25-year goal, but in a questionnaire says she would sell her equity funds at the fi…
- In risk profiling of an investor, which of the following best describes 'risk capacity' as distinct from 'risk tolerance'?