Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Taxation (UK) · Ethical and professional issues arising from the giving of tax planning advice

Which of the following is an example of legitimate tax mitigation rather than avoidance involving artificial arrangements?

Making a pension contribution to obtain tax relief is legitimate tax mitigation because it uses a relief in the way Parliament intended. Artificial, circular or purely tax-driven arrangements may be abusive avoidance, and backdating documents is evasion.

  1. ARouting a sale of shares through an offshore company set up solely so that no gain arises, with no commercial purpose
  2. BCreating a circular series of loans between connected companies to generate an artificial deductible loss
  3. CMaking a pension contribution to obtain tax relief, using the relief as Parliament intendedCorrect
  4. DBackdating a document to show a gift was made before the start of the tax year

Explanation

Using a relief as Parliament intended, such as pension contributions, is mitigation. Contrived offshore routing and circular loans with no commercial purpose are artificial arrangements that the GAAR may counteract. Backdating a document is fraudulent and amounts to evasion.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Ethical and professional issues arising from the giving of tax planning advice shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Ethical and professional issues arising from the giving of tax planning advice questions