CA Foundation · Business Economics · Determination of National Income
Which of the following is most likely to cause an upward parallel shift of the entire consumption function, rather than a movement along it?
A rise in household wealth shifts the consumption function upward. Wealth is a non-income determinant that raises autonomous consumption at every income level, whereas changes in national income only move the economy along the existing consumption function.
- AA rise in national income
- BA rise in household wealth due to higher asset pricesCorrect
- CA fall in national income
- DA rise in the marginal propensity to save along the same line
Explanation
Changes in income cause movements along the consumption function. Non-income factors such as wealth, expectations or credit availability change autonomous consumption and shift the curve. Higher wealth raises the intercept, shifting the function upward.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Determination of National Income shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Determination of National Income questions
- Which of the following is an example of an injection into the circular flow of income in an open economy?
- In a three-sector economy with no foreign trade, C = 100 + 0.8Yd, I = ₹300 crore, G = ₹200 crore, and taxes are a lump sum T = ₹100 crore. W…
- In the Keynesian two-sector model, the economy is in equilibrium when:
- A farmer sells wheat worth ₹40,000 to a flour mill. The mill produces flour and sells it for ₹55,000 to a bakery. The bakery makes bread and…
- An Indian economy has GDP at market prices of ₹900 crore, net factor income from abroad of ₹(-)20 crore (a net outflow), and depreciation of…
- Which of the following will make the investment multiplier in an economy smaller?